Tag cloud

1st 37signals Aaltoes aaltovg acquisition advertising advice agile analysis Angry Birds article Asmo Halinen attitude aula awards bad stuff Balancion bankruptcy beginning being in touch blog blogs bluesky positioning blyk board membership bobba bolder book bootstrapping Brain Alliance brainhack braking news brian alliance briefs cases cc communication communications community behavior competition conference conferences cool new stuff creativity critique crowdsourcing data day of failure dayforfailure.com dd deal making Deasign deeplead design dopplr ecommerce economy ecosystem elections elinvoima email emba enca.fi entrepreneurs entrepreneurship epaonnistumisenpaiva ethics event events evetns examples exit facebook fail day failing failure fame features financing Finland Finland Young Professionals finnish first freerider Fruugo fun fwd FYP games good morning finland good stuff google gossip government gps grandone helene auramo human interaction humans huomenta suomi ideas innovation interview investment invitation iphone IPR IRC-Galleria iron sky jobs jussi laakkonen key note launch law leadership learning magenta management marketing Mårten Mickos Martin Varsavsky material microblogs mikko tikka monday morning Morten Lund motivators MTV3 Muxlim MySQL Netcycler networking new Nokia nominations nordic business forum nordic scene Obama online communities online games open Open Source openess openness opportunity outside story panel people personal personal opinion pictures pinball dreams podcast polictics policy politics PR presentation pricing problem Project WORM proposals public beta random stuff recognition recruiting red herring richard branson RunToShop school Scrooge McDuck shameless self-promotion showcases SIME sitra slush social media social networks society soprano sources of information sources of informations speaking gig speculation speech Startup Sauna startups starwreck statistics stockmarket strateginen kilpailukyky strategy success story Sulake tabu tane.li Tapio Hedman taxes teams techcrunch Tekes The Bachelor the economy TheNextWeb Tiburon-TV tips tradesale transaction transformational leadership travel tsunami TV tv-kaista tvinno vakuutuskone.com valuation vc vertical communities video videos voting vs war story wealth welcome welcome to finland work World of Warcraft wreck a movie Wunderkraut xiha life

Newsletter

 

Entrepreneurs as the source of wealth-diffusion

Here's a good video about entrepreneurship made by the Kauffman Foundation:

Video also in YouTube here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7VZIbeUrSU

This same topic; innovators, entrepreneurs etc as wealth creators, job creators in society is also a hot topic here in Finland at the moment. The country would desperately need precisely those things.

The global crisis of oversized governments, with reckless overspending and debt taking has already all but ruined the economy and will continue to haunt us for the near future. The governments will not be able to solve a problem they themselves have created.

Finland also has a massive oversized and bloated behemoth of a Government. Currently the 2010 figure for GDP % of the public sector in Finland is 55.3%, according to Eurostat, that means that the public sector in its entirety is larger than the private sector. How long can this madness go on? Not for long. I have been told that no nation in the history of the world has survived for long with a larger public sector than it's private sector.

The Finnish Statistical Bureau, Tilastokeskus, Also has some 2009 data available: they state that the public sector is 56.3% of GDP in 2009. Source here.

As the public sector expenditure is so massive % from GDP this forms a particular problem: it makes the economy increasingly dependent on the public sector and its cash flow. If simultaneously the public sector purchases from the private sector are conservative in attitude and always favor the big corporations then we have another particular problem as the spending never flows to the new. Public sector spending is massive and to large extent its just maintaining the status quo. A cynical person might comment that perhaps this is by design, working as intended?

Needless to say this is totally batshit insane and cannot be sustained for long. The public sector needs to diminish to half it's size, or possibly more, immediately. And the longer we wait, the more massive the cut will have to be later on. The only alternative to this is to rapidly grow the private sector in such a massive way that the GDP% balance shifts and the private sector quickly becomes much larger than the public sector. What do we need for this?: you guessed it; successful innovators and entrepreneurs. By the thousands.

This brings us back to entrepreneurs and innovators. They are the solution to turn this around and get the country, the EU and the economy back on a healthy track.

Every time a brilliant innovator and entrepreneur successfully takes a magnificent product/service/whatever to the markets we all benefit from it in a massive way;

Imagine someone inventing a free, easy to produce, endless energy source and taking that to market. Something like a quantum zero point energy source possibly. We would all benefit and be enriched by it in a massive way. Such an innovation would bring disproportionate amounts of wealth, extra free time in our lives, etc.

Imagine someone inventing a cell-phone (and network) that operates with gravitons and gravity-micro-ripples in the gravity field instead of the usual electromagnetic radiation and distortions in the electromagnetic field of earth as our current cell phones operate in. This tech, taken successfully to market, would mean massive benefits and cool stuff for us all. Making the cell phones work underground (or undersea) amongst other cool things.

The examples could go on forever. Every time an innovator or an entrepreneur creates something new, something valuable and successfully takes that to the markets - we all benefit as a result. We all receive a gift of more free time, the gift of increased performance, etc.

Imagine having to cook a chicken for dinner without any technology; taking a knife (or a sharp stone), butchering the chicken at first, then skinning it, processing it, taking a few hours to light a fire without any tech (or is fire tech also?, yes it is, in fact..), and perhaps after a full day of work you could have it cooked. Imagine having to visit Oulu without any tech: walking there from Helsinki would take more than 5 days according to Google Maps directions. Tech and successfully commercialized innovations make our life fabulous, rich and give us free time to do other things with our lives besides live in caves and hunt for food every day (as we would be without innovations and technology.)

The wealth created by such success would be diffused throughout the society in every level; making the poor richer, and also the rich richer. This diffusion happens through mutually voluntary exchange of value-for-value and ends up effectively diffusing wealth to every level and corner of society. Today, however this doesn't happen optimally: as the public sector is so freaking massive, larger than the private sector, we have a parasite in the system: instead of healthy natural diffusion we get suction. We have a massive freeraiding vermin in the system that sucks away the wealth created, and intercepts the diffusion - by means in intervention, excessive taxation, regulation, the non-producing public sector sucks a lot of it away, and doesn't allow for the diffusion to happen. Instead of voluntary value-for-value exchange we get involuntary value-for-nonvalue exchange. That isn't an exchange at all; it's more like a violation of individual rights and legalized robbery.

The Finns often think that "society" is the same as "government" or "the state". We must be pretty much the only nation thinking this way. Finns are government-worshippers, statists. In just about every other part of the world people tend to think that society = the people, and the that the people pay for the government, the people allow the government to exist by their mandate, and that the government works for the people. Lately I have seen interviews in the media here in Finland from the Green Party politicians saying that "we must increase taxes because the government needs to be pay for the society".. it's amazing how fucked up this issue can be in people's brains; it's the society that pays for the government, certainly not the other way around.

Innovators, entrepreneurs and growth companies cannot flourish in an environment of massive taxes, larger public sector than private, over-regulation and over-intervention at every level. Governments simply can't regulate and tax innovations and growth companies into existence and success. Cannot be done.

Today we have a crisis. This would be our way out. Currently however I am worried that the public debate on the issue is going to the other direction: more restrictions, more taxes, more tackling down this process of innovation and the new that could benefit us all. It's almost like the government would not want people to be better, would not want everyone to benefit from cool new things that enrich our lives and massively benefit us all. Is this the case for real? I'm starting to suspect that it is. I'm beginning to suspect that because one massively successful entrepreneur might capture 0.5% of the value for herself (and the 99.5% goes to the rest of us) the Finns are so jealous that they won't allow or accept this to happen. This is pure evil. Unethical behavior that leads to maximizing human misery and making the poor more poorer, along with making the rich more poorer too.

Think about it for a while, and consider how you can affect this attitude. We are in crisis, the clock is ticking, every day our oversized government is spending and going deeper into dept. Courageous urgent action is required and this topic needs to enter and stay in the public eye.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://tane.li/trackback/146
Share on Facebook PingThis

Comments

I think the argument you are

I think the argument you are making is not supported by the data. The US has a far smaller government and far more entrepreneurship yet it too has rapidly growing deficits and despite incredible growth the median income has not increased in 30 years. The US also does terribly on a range of other indicators such as child poverty, mortality and social mobility. The fact is that for the average person to benefit from economic growth some redistribution from market outcomes is necessary.

But you are absolutely right that supporting innovation one way or another improves people's lives. Here is a suggestion: Finland has a deficit which needs to be tackled either by reducing government services or by raising taxes. I suggest we raise taxes on the wealthiest but we give them an option. Either they pay an additional 10% tax on everything they earn over €100,000 or they can invest the same amount into a startup or seed fund. This would have a number of benefits:

1) It would create a lot of seed capital. Even €50m per year would give seed funding to 500 web startups.
2) It would force high earners to become angel investors. Once they became interested they might even invest more.
3) It would attract VC's and other investors.
4) With much money around it would encourage rock start entrepreneurs around Europe to come to Finland.

Over time, with enough success stories taxes could ultimately be lowered again on the back of the growth and because Tekes would be unnecessary.

@ Jon Martin

The United States has been devoured by its war operations around the globe together with the debt-lust of both consumers and the public sector. Ramprant debt taking is a natural result of the unhealthy low level of interest rates that has prevailed for several yers. Cheap money such as this encourages to stupid risk taking from both individuals AND enterprises. And to make my point clear I don't think there is anything inherently wrong with risk taking, it is a key element of enterpreneurship - but the availability of cheap money makes the risk taking disproportionate. Also I would like to point out that large public sectors such as the one in Finland are not required for people to not die on the streets. Please maintain the perspective ; it's not a choice between people starving on the streets and "Government employs over 50%"-dystopia.

As per your suggestion: I would concentrate on cutting government expenditure. Your model model might initially seem fair and beneficial but it takes the freedom of choice away from those with capital at their disposal.

On the basis of your suggestion, I ask you: If you were a multimillionaire in Finland, would you:

A) Pay additional amounts of taxes just because you happen to be wealthy, so that state and municipalities can burn them away on the never-ending list of public "service" that they invent to employ themselves.

B) Pay the abovementioned sum as start up capital/seed funds in a country infested with
- with some half a million civil servants out of 3 million's work force
- uncomprehensive regulation and overly eager attitude toward EU/EC-regulations
- one of the highest taxation rates in Europe (or world)
- long distances
- small domestic market
- strange language
- border with the Baltic sea and Russia
- mentality that supports government interventions and hostility towards entrepreneurship
- political system in which even the most liberal rightist party maintains its power through the support of teachers, policemen, firemen, military offices, doctors, nurses etc.

OR...

C) Move your capital the hell away?

@emppu The US has many

@emppu

The US has many problems but the cheap money and profligate spending are a relatively recent phenomenon, their social problems are not. Let's be clear, until the economic crisis Finland's state spent about 44% of GDP. To put that in perspective, Sweden and Norway were spending about 50% of GDP, the UK some 38% and the US about 25%. So this is all a question of degree. There is though, a very strong correlation between high levels of absolute poverty and low levels of government spending. It's no coincidence that the US and UK have the highest levels of child poverty in the OECD along with a whole bunch of other ugly indicators. There simply is no good example of a country that has low levels of government spending without having serious social problems. Market outcomes concentrate wealth at the top - that's just the way they work. Also, I will repeat the most devastating statistic: median income in the US has not risen in 30 years.

I don't think anyone earning over €100,000 is a multi-millionaire but even accepting that, the idea that they will flee the country is also not supported by the data. They could already save huge amounts of money by moving to the US or Luxembourg or wherever. I quote Jari Sarasvuo "Among the wealthy there is a good sense of responsibility. Many of my friends and I would be ready to pay more in taxes”. If they are ready to pay more in taxes, I'm sure they are ready to invest in seed funds.

One last point: the environment for investment in Finland is actually pretty good. The bureaucracy to set up and run a company is not particularly onerous compared to the US or UK, and as we have seen by any number of examples, it's perfectly possible to start a successful business here.

Economic democracy is the solution

Hi Taneli!

I would argue that the biggest problem with spending is money itself. Money is debt. And currently they are just adding debt over debt all over the world.

Solution is economic democracy:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_democracy

We have to change the way money is created, that is, give goverments back the right to make money, regulate it, and perhaps go back to gold standard for dollars (and euros too).

When private institutions (banks) create artificial money and pump that to markets, they are creating a massive problem worldwide.

If you would like to know more, please visit Talousdemokratia.fi web pages (in finnish), for example http://www.talousdemokratia.fi/sivut/ukk

In english, you would like to watch an internet documentary called "Money as debt", that explains the creation of money via debt.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVkFb26u9g8

Thanks!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options